Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(branch, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(branch, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(APP(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(branch) = 3   
POL(leaf) = 4   
POL(app(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1 + (3)x_2   
POL(mapbt) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPOrderProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(APP(x1, x2)) = (1/2)x_2   
POL(branch) = 1/4   
POL(app(x1, x2)) = (5/2)x_1 + x_2   
POL(mapbt) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 125/64.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPOrderProof
            ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDPOrderProof
                ↳ QDP
                  ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.